Carey Danis & Lowe | Attorneys at Law
  • Home
  • Our Attorneys
    • About Carey Danis & Lowe
  • Featured Cases
  • Practice Areas
    • Antitrust
    • Class Actions
      • AT&T Cell Phone Bill Cramming
      • AT&T Telephone Bill Cramming
      • Credit Card Payment Protection
    • Defective & Faulty Medical Device Litigation
      • Guidant Defibrillator
      • Hip & Knee Replacement
      • Ob Tape & Slings
      • Transvaginal Mesh
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Personal Injury
      • Truck & Car Accidents
    • Pharmaceutical Litigation
      • Accutane®
      • Actos®
      • Asbestos Mesothelioma
      • Avandia®
      • Celexa®
      • Levaquin®
      • Lexapro®
      • Luvox®
      • Mirena®
      • NuvaRing®
      • Paxil®
      • Pradaxa®
      • Prozac®
      • Symbyax®
      • Topamax®
      • Wellbutrin®
      • Yaz® Yasmin®
      • Zoloft®
    • Product Liability
    • Securities Fraud
    • Unfair & Deceptive Trades
  • Firm News
    • Firm Resume
    • Press Release
    • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
    • via Email
    • via Facebook
    • via LinkedIn
    • via Twitter
    • via RSS
  • Blog
Like Carey Danis & Lowe on FacebookConnect With Carey Danis & Lowe on LinkedInFollow Carey Danis & Lowe on TwitterSubscribe to Carey Danis & Lowe via RSS

  P.  800.721.2519
 Ask a Nurse

Home » Pharmaceutical litigation • Yaz/Yasmin » Controversy Surrounds the FDA& ...

Controversy Surrounds the FDA’s Decision to Keep Yaz On the Market

Published June 20, 2012 on LawsuitInformation.org

The FDA recently mandated that Bayer Pharmaceuticals change the warning labels on two of its most popular birth control pills to reflect recent research relating to blood clots as a result of Yasmin or Yaz. The decision comes in the midst of many ongoing lawsuits against Bayer and generic Yasmin or Yaz manufacturers relating to side effects resulting from Yaz, and has been met with criticism from watchdog groups and other advocacy groups accusing the FDA of not doing enough.

FDA addresses concerns about blood clots as a result of Yaz

In December of last year, an FDA panel of 26 advisors elected to institute the new warnings rather than remove the pills from the consumer market. The vote tallied 15 to 11 in favor of keeping the hormonal birth control pills on the market, but 21 to 5 in favor of instituting stronger warnings about blood clots. Panel members reasoned that the drugs should be kept on the market because the benefits they offer outweigh the possible risks.

In crafting the language of the new warning labels, the FDA has required that they “report that some epidemiologic studies reported as high as three-fold increase in the risk of blood clots for drospirenone-containing products [(the active ingredient in Yasmin and Yaz)] whereas other epidemiological studies found no additional risk.” However, this decision remains controversial as several women’s advocacy groups have pointed out that some of the studies falling in the latter category received funding from Bayer or other contraceptive industry players, and thus may not have been objective, and the results therefore unreliable.

Further adding to the controversy, it has since been discovered that four of the twenty-six FDA panel members had previous affiliations with manufacturers of contraceptives containing drospirenone. The compromising nature of this potential conflict of interests compelled the watchdog group Project on Government Oversight to advocate for a new review and vote on the continued sale of contraceptives like Yasmin and Yaz. Further, on March 9, 2012 a group of four women’s advocacy organizations sent a letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg voicing concern about the administration’s decision to keep the drugs on the market.

Many women have been filing a Yasmin lawsuit

As the federal regulatory controversy over Yasmin and Yaz unfolds, plaintiff after plaintiff continues to file a Yaz lawsuit against Bayer and generic Yaz manufacturers alleging health complications like blood clots. Almost 7,000 of these lawsuits have been consolidated into an Illinois multi-district litigation under presiding Judge David R. Herndon. Judge Herndon has actively encouraged parties to seek resolution outside of court by pushing back the initial trials several times.

Submit Your Claim

Which Contraceptive were you taking?
 Yaz Yasmin Ocella Other

When were you taking this drug?
to

3+4 

    • Tweet
     
     

    If you or a loved one has been injured, submit your claim for a free consultation here or call toll free 800.721.2519



    « Toward The Past: Update June 2012: Yaz & Yasmin Court Information
    Toward The Future: Johnson & Johnson Discontinue the Ethicon Transvaginal Mesh Implant »



    This artice has been read 739 times.


    Filed under: Pharmaceutical litigation, Yaz/Yasmin
    Tagged with: , Bayer, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, birth control, blood clots, contraceptive, FDA, Judge Herndon, litigation, side effects, Yasmin, Yaz
    Posted by: Scott Godar

     
    • Featured Cases & Current Litigation

      • Vaginal Mesh Litigation
      • Topamax® Birth Defects
      • Lexapro® & Birth Defects
      • Pradaxa® Internal Bleeding
      • Prozac® & Birth Defects
      • Yaz® & Yasmin® Blood Clots
      • Transvaginal Mesh Injury
      • Paxil® & Birth Defects
      • NuvaRing® Blood Clots
      • Mirena® IUD Complications
      • Asbestos Mesothelioma
      • Trucking Accidents & Passenger Vehicle Collision Settlements
    • Recent Posts & News Articles

      • Cooper v. Takeda Jury Presented with Plaintiff Closing Argument Linking Actos and Bladder Cancer
      • Bayer Loses Yaz Patent in Federal Court of Appeals: Generic Yaz Versions Begin (Stealing) Marketshare
      • Carey Danis & Lowe Pradaxa Lawyers Currently Following Pradaxa MDL 2385
      • FDA Approves New Anticoagulation Reversal Agent and Boehringer Ingelheim Updates Pradaxa Label
      • Carey Danis & Lowe Actos Cancer Lawyers Optimistic Following Cooper v. Takeda $6.5 Million Compensatory Award
      • Carey Danis & Lowe Pelvic Mesh Lawyers Weigh in on Ethicon MDL 2327 and Gynecare Prolift Mesh Lawsuit Removal Request
      • Pradaxa Timeline: Carey Danis & Lowe Pradaxa Lawyers Chronicle Pradaxa Bleeding Risk
      • Flores v. Ethicon: Transvaginal Mesh Trial Memorandum Opinion & Order
    Our Offices
    Saint Louis, Missouri
    8235 Forsyth Ste 1100
    St. Louis, MO 63105
    T. 314 725 7700
    F. 314 721 0905
    Godfrey, Illinois
    5512 Godfrey Road
    Godfrey, IL 62035
    T. 618 463 0644
    F. 314 721 0905
    Belleville, Illinois
    5111 W. Main Street
    Belleville, IL 62226
    T. 618 212 6300
    F. 314 721 0905
    Vero Beach, Florida
    612 Beachland Blvd
    Vero Beach, FL 32963
    T. 314 725 7700
    F. 314 721 0905
    © 2013 Carey Danis & Lowe
    reVisioned.by
    Toll Free P. 800-721-2519
    Home • Contact • About