Carey Danis & Lowe | Attorneys at Law
  • Home
  • Our Attorneys
    • About Carey Danis & Lowe
  • Featured Cases
  • Practice Areas
    • Antitrust
    • Class Actions
      • AT&T Cell Phone Bill Cramming
      • AT&T Telephone Bill Cramming
      • Credit Card Payment Protection
    • Defective & Faulty Medical Device Litigation
      • Guidant Defibrillator
      • Hip & Knee Replacement
      • Ob Tape & Slings
      • Transvaginal Mesh
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Personal Injury
      • Truck & Car Accidents
    • Pharmaceutical Litigation
      • Accutane®
      • Actos®
      • Asbestos Mesothelioma Litigation
      • Avandia®
      • Celexa®
      • Levaquin®
      • Lexapro®
      • Luvox®
      • Mirena®
      • NuvaRing®
      • Paxil®
      • Pradaxa®
      • Prozac®
      • Symbyax®
      • Topamax®
      • Wellbutrin®
      • Yaz® Yasmin®
      • Zoloft®
    • Product Liability
    • Securities Fraud
    • Unfair & Deceptive Trades
  • Firm News
    • Firm Resume
    • Press Release
    • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
    • via Email
    • via Facebook
    • via LinkedIn
    • via Twitter
    • via RSS
  • Blog
Like Carey Danis & Lowe on FacebookConnect With Carey Danis & Lowe on LinkedInFollow Carey Danis & Lowe on TwitterSubscribe to Carey Danis & Lowe via RSS

  P.  800.721.2519
 Ask a Nurse

Home » Defective Medical Device litigation • Vaginal Mesh Implants » Johnson & Johnson Discont ...

Johnson & Johnson Discontinue the Ethicon Transvaginal Mesh Implant

Published June 21, 2012 on LawsuitInformation.org

Ethicon, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson sent letters to the judges in federal and state court overseeing vaginal mesh lawsuits to notify them that the company is going to stop selling the following products: -Gynecare TVT Secure; -Gynecare Prosima Pelvic Floor System; -Gynecare Prolift Pelvic Floor System; -Gynecare Prolift+M Pelvic Floor System; and -Gynecare Gynemash PS.

These types of products are transvaginal mesh implants used to help women for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). These mesh implants made by Ethicon as well as other medical companies have been associated with serious, painful complications for women. Such complications include: infections, erosion of the mesh through the vagina, hardening or shrinkage of the mesh, pelvic pain, urinary problems and pain during sexual intercourse. In many cases, husbands and partners have injured themselves during intercourse.

Ethicon’s decision seems like a recall; however, Matthew Johnson, Ethicon’s spokesperson, is trying to convince the public that the company’s decision to stop selling the vaginal mesh implants has nothing to do with the products being unsafe. Evidence shows otherwise—more than 600 lawsuits have been filed against Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon over the transvaginal mesh products. Ethicon has requested that the FDA give the company 120 days to “cease commercialization” so that the company can provide surgeons and hospitals with time to pick alternative treatment options, notify their patients, and change marketing materials. The company has also asked the FDA to hold on to the recent orders that the FDA conduct studies on these unsafe medical devices in midst of the growing concerns.

The FDA has required companies and/or manufacturers of these types of transvaginal mesh products to conduct tests and studies on the products after the FDA received complaints from thousands of women who experienced complications after they underwent procedures to repair POP and SUI. The FDA is trying to determine the risk with vaginal mesh products and weigh the products’ benefits compared to the risks. It was in July, 2011 when the FDA warned the public about the serious complications with these mesh patches that are implanted in women to treat POP or SUI. When they made this warning, they received more than 3,800 reports of adverse effects caused by the surgical mesh or during the implantation of the patch.

If you have suffered complications due to the implantation of an Ethicon product or some other transvaginal mesh to treat POP, you have a right to compensation. By filing a claim against the surgical mesh manufacturer, you could receive compensation for medical costs, other financial burdens and the pain and suffering caused by this defective medical device.

Submit Your Claim

2+3 

    • Tweet
     
     

    If you or a loved one has been injured, submit your claim for a free consultation here or call toll free 800.721.2519



    « Toward The Past: Controversy Surrounds the FDA’s Decision to Keep Yaz On the Market
    Toward The Future: Carey Danis & Lowe Attorneys Investigate Lexapro Birth Defect Link »



    This artice has been read 730 times.


    Filed under: Defective Medical Device litigation, Vaginal Mesh Implants
    Tagged with: , defective, Ethicon, FDA, Johnson Johnson, Matthew Johnson, POP, recall, SUI, transvaginal mesh
    Posted by: Scott Godar

     
    • Featured Cases & Current Litigation

      • Vaginal Mesh Litigation
      • Topamax® Birth Defects
      • Lexapro® & Birth Defects
      • Pradaxa® Internal Bleeding
      • Prozac® & Birth Defects
      • Yaz® & Yasmin® Blood Clots
      • Transvaginal Mesh Injury
      • Paxil® & Birth Defects
      • NuvaRing® Blood Clots
      • Mirena® IUD Complications
      • Asbestos Mesothelioma
      • Trucking Accidents & Passenger Vehicle Collision Settlements
    • Recent Posts & News Articles

      • NuvaRing Lawsuit News: NuvaRing Lawsuits Recently Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
      • Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit News: Carey Danis & Lowe Remarks on West Virginia Vaginal Mesh MDLs Complaint Form Update
      • Mirena IUD Lawsuit News: Mirena IUD Lawsuits Consolidated into Multicounty Litigation in New Jersey
      • Transvaginal Mesh Lawyers at Carey Danis & Lowe Report on Ethicon MDL 2327 Pretrial Order 48
      • NuvaRing Lawsuit News from Carey Danis & Lowe NuvaRing Law Firm: Seven Cases Removed from NuvaRing Multicounty Litigation in New Jersey
      • Carey Danis & Lowe Actos Lawyers Comment on Annulled Cooper v. Takeda Compensatory Award
      • Chicago DePuy Hip Trial Jury Rules in Favor of Johnson & Johnson and DePuy
      • Cooper v. Takeda Jury Presented with Plaintiff Closing Argument Linking Actos and Bladder Cancer
    Our Offices
    Saint Louis, Missouri
    8235 Forsyth Ste 1100
    St. Louis, MO 63105
    T. 314 725 7700
    F. 314 721 0905
    Godfrey, Illinois
    5512 Godfrey Road
    Godfrey, IL 62035
    T. 618 463 0644
    F. 314 721 0905
    Belleville, Illinois
    5111 W. Main Street
    Belleville, IL 62226
    T. 618 212 6300
    F. 314 721 0905
    Vero Beach, Florida
    612 Beachland Blvd
    Vero Beach, FL 32963
    T. 314 725 7700
    F. 314 721 0905
    © 2013 Carey Danis & Lowe
    reVisioned.by
    Toll Free P. 800-721-2519
    Home • Contact • About