Tag

Ethicon Gynecare Prolift Archives - Carey Danis & Lowe

Federal Judge Overseeing Ethicon Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits Levies Sanctions Against Defense Counsel

By | Defective Medical Device litigation, Transvaginal Mesh, Uncategorized

Published May 16, 2014 by Digital Journal

Boston Scientific Ordered to Release Defective Transvaginal Mesh DocumentsBoston Scientific Ordered to Release Defective Transvaginal Mesh DocumentsThe federal judge overseeing thousands of transvaginal mesh lawsuits filed against Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon, Inc. unit has sanctioned the companies’ attorneys for removing certain cases to federal court, despite numerous rulings that the lawsuits belong in a Pennsylvania litigation. According to court documents, the lawsuits in question named Pennsylvania-based Secant Medical Inc. as a defendant, and were originally filed in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. In an Order issued on May 13, 2014, U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin of the Southern District of West Virginia wrote that the defense attempts to move the cases, despite repeated rulings that Secant had not been fraudulently joined, were calculated “to keep these cases out of state court for as long as possible and to waste the court’s time and the plaintiff’s resources.” (In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2327)

Ethicon Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Court documents indicate that more than 18,000 transvaginal mesh lawsuits have been filed in the Southern District of West Virginia on behalf of women who were allegedly injured by Ethicon devices used in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Bernstein Liebhard LLP partner, Jeffrey S. Grand, is serving on the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in that proceeding. All of the complaints allege that the use of these devices caused thousands of women to suffer mesh erosion, chronic pain, organ damage and other serious, and sometimes permanent, vaginal mesh complications.

Mr. Grand is also serving as Co-Liaison Counsel in two multicounty litigations underway in New Jersey Superior Court for transvaginal mesh lawsuits involving products marketed by C.R. Bard and Ethicon. He was also a member of the Plaintiff’s trial team on the first Ethicon trial in that proceeding, which ended in March with a jury awarding $11 million in compensatory and punitive damages to a woman who was harmed by the Ethicon Gynecare Prolift device. (In re: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litigation, No. 6341-10; In re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation/Bard, No. L-6339-10)

According to court records, more than 55,000 transvaginal mesh lawsuits have been filed against a number of device manufacturers in litigations that are underway in the Southern District of West Virginia. Mr. Grand is also serving on the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committees in proceedings involving : American Medical Systems, Inc. (MDL No. 2325); Boston Scientific Corp., (MDL No. 2326); and C.R. Bard, Inc., (MDL No. 2187).

<p”>Alleged victims of vaginal mesh complications may be entitled to file their own transvaginal mesh lawsuit. To learn more about the litigation involving these devices, please visit https://www.careydanis.com. To obtain a free, confidential and no-obligation case review, please call 1.800.721.2519.

J&J and Ethicon to Pay Penalty for Document Mishandling

By | Defective Medical Device litigation, Transvaginal Mesh, Uncategorized

Boston Scientific Ordered to Release Defective Transvaginal Mesh DocumentsBoston Scientific Ordered to Release Defective Transvaginal Mesh DocumentsJohnson & Johnson and Ethicon mishandled internal documents that were of great importance in the Ethicon multidistrict litigation (MDL) being heard in West Virginia. As a result, U.S. Magistrate Judge Cheryl Eifert penalized Johnson & Johnson, and their subsidiary, Ethicon, by ordering them to pay a fine.

The court is still deciding on the penalty amount.

It is unclear if Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, the medical device manufacturer behind the Gynecare Prolift transvaginal mesh product, purposefully destroyed the internal documents in question. Since purposeful destruction was never proven, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon were not dealt more severe penalties.

There are over 16,000 transvaginal mesh lawsuits pending in the Ethicon MDL in West Virginia. The Ethicon MDL is In re: Ethicon, Inc. Pelvic Repair Systems Product Liability Litigation MDL no. 2327, and is being heard in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia.

Victims of transvaginal mesh, including those who received an implant of the Ethicon Gynecare Prolift, have contacted Carey Danis & Lowe for legal assistance. The team of class action attorneys at Carey Danis & Lowe currently represents many women across the United States in transvaginal mesh lawsuits.

Explore your legal options and eligibility for compensation with Carey Danis & Lowe today. Schedule an appointment to meet with one of our attorneys in person at one of our four locations. We have law offices in Missouri, Illinois, and Florida.

Our attorneys are also available to discuss your case over the phone. Contact our law offices by calling 800.721.2519.

You can also contact us by completing a personal injury claim form.

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit News: Johnson & Johnson Accused of Document Destruction

By | Defective Medical Device litigation, Transvaginal Mesh, Uncategorized

ethicon_johnson_johnson_transvaginal_mesh_lawsuit_litigation_obtape_pelvic_prolapse_complications_surgery_correctiveTransvaginal mesh lawsuits have been consolidated into the Ethicon multidistrict litigation (MDL) in West Virginia. In a court document filed in early December 2013, plaintiffs’ legal counsel argued that Johnson & Johnson and their subsidiary, Ethicon, mishandled thousands of documents. The plaintiffs’ legal counsel accuses Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon of having destroyed these documents.

In a Bloomberg report, it appears that Johnson & Johnson instructed Ethicon  to save documents. Even so, according to the recently filed court document, Ethicon officials destroyed all digital files on the computer of a former Ethicon president.

However, in light of what appears to be improper document management, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon continue to contend that their document retention is sound.

Those representing plaintiffs in the West Virginia MDL do not want the lack of certain Ethicon materials to negatively impact upcoming bellwether trials. The first Ethicon bellwether trial is scheduled for February 10, 2014.

Thousands of Lawsuits

According to Bloomberg, there are over 30,000 transvaginal mesh lawsuits pending in the six multidistrict litigations in West Virginia, one of which is the Ethicon MDL

These six MDLs are being heard in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, and are all being heard by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. The five other transvaginal mesh MDLs target C.R. Bard, American Medical Systems, Boston Scientific, Coloplast, and Cook Medical.

Transvaginal Mesh Side Effects

Two of the most commonly reported transvaginal mesh complications that lead to significant injury include erosion and contraction. Women have also reported a number of other health issues, including pelvic pain, bleeding, and dyspareunia.

Carey Danis & Lowe is Here to Help

Carey Danis & Lowe is a national law firm based in St. Louis that represents women who have been injured by transvaginal mesh devices, such as the Ethicon Gynecare Prolift. If you believe that your injuries are the result of a transvaginal mesh implant, explore your legal options in a free initial consultation with a Carey Danis & Lowe transvaginal mesh lawyer.

In addition, Carey Danis & Lowe has a team of highly experienced on-staff nurses who are available to discuss transvaginal mesh side effects. Our nurses are here to listen closely to your concerns and to answer your health questions.

Share your transvaginal mesh story with Carey Danis & Lowe today. Call 800.721.2519, or submit a confidential personal injury claim form.

Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit News: New Pretrial Order Filed in West Virginia Federal Court

By | Defective Medical Device litigation, Transvaginal Mesh, Uncategorized

gavel_multidistrict_litigation_settlements_trial_transvaginal_mesh_lawsuitsTransvaginal mesh lawyers at Carey Danis & Lowe note that the transvaginal mesh lawsuits consolidated into six multidistrict litigations (MDLs) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia are continuing to make progress with a new document filed by the court. The latest pretrial order filed by the court pertains to upcoming status conference meetings for all six of the MDLs. The status conference scheduled for November 7, 2013 has been canceled, with the next status conference scheduled for December 5.

The pretrial order provides dates for future status conferences through September 2014.

U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin is presiding over the six transvaginal mesh MDLs. As of late October 2013, there are 5,290 cases in the C. R. Bard MDL; 11,329 cases targeted at American Medical Systems; 6,957 lawsuits pending in the Boston Scientific MDL; 11,158 cases in the Ethicon MDL; 1,126 lawsuits consolidated into the Coloplast Corp. MDL; and Cook Medical faces 157 lawsuits.

Women who have received a transvaginal implant and have experienced an adverse outcome continue to contact the transvaginal mesh lawyers at Carey Danis & Lowe for legal advice, and to speak with one of our on-staff nurses. If you believe that your injuries originate from a defective transvaginal mesh device, you have a case that may be eligible for compensation.

Carey Danis & Lowe is here to discuss your legal options, and to assist with filing a transvaginal mesh lawsuit. Share your transvaginal mesh story with Carey Danis & Lowe today by calling 800.721.2519, or by completing a confidential personal injury claim.

Learn more about transvaginal mesh lawsuits by reading Carey Danis & Lowe’s articles about the Ethicon Gynecare Prolift transvaginal mesh device, and find out the latest on the transvaginal mesh MDL settlement discussions.

Ethicon Gynecare Prolift History & Lawsuit Background

By | Defective Medical Device litigation, Transvaginal Mesh, Uncategorized

ethicon johson johnsonTransvaginal mesh is used to treat patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). As a national law firm representing individuals who believe their injuries (stem) from transvaginal mesh implants, Carey Danis & Lowe is invested in providing out clients and those who would like to learn more about transvaginal mesh with a comprehensive background of this product.

The following review of Ethicon’s Gynecare Prolift transvaginal mesh device contextualizes the mounting lawsuits targeted at this medical device manufacturer.

In March 2005, Ethicon, a unit of Johnson & Johnson, ushered the Gynecare Prolift transvaginal mesh device onto the medical device market. In marketing the mesh, Ethicon promoted it as an state-of-the-art device with successful outcomes.

According to Bloomberg, Ethicon sold the Gynecare Prolift for three years without approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ethicon reasoned that the Prolift model was similar enough to an existing FDA approved product, the Gynecare Gynemesh device, that requesting FDA approval was unnecessary.

However, after learning about the Prolift model in 2007, the FDA deemed the unsanctioned release of the Prolift as unacceptable.

Even so, the FDA granted approval of Ethicon’s Gynecare Prolift in May 2008.

In 2011, three years after the Prolift’s approval, the FDA received strong recommendations from an advisory body to categorize transvaginal mesh as causing significant harm. They also advised that more research was necessary in order to determine the safety of transvaginal mesh, and that this research should involve human subjects.

In January 2012, the FDA ordered makers of transvaginal mesh to conduct studies of mesh related injuries, among them damage to organs. This order was directed at Ethicon and thirty other mesh manufacturers.

Later in 2012, Ethicon initiated a Gynecare Prolift recall. They also removed three other transvaginal mesh products off of the market, the Prolift+ M, TVT Secur, and Prosima.

In justifying its recall, Ethicon claimed the action was not influenced by mounting lawsuits or reported health complications, but instead with market viability.

Also in 2012, transvaginal mesh lawsuits were consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia before U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. The litigation is In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation MDL No. 2327.

As of early October 2013, there are currently 10,400 vaginal mesh lawsuits targeted at Ethicon and their transvaginal mesh products in the West Virginia MDL.

These lawsuits claim that Ethicon’s transvaginal mesh products, including the Gynecare Prolift, caused serious injuries. More specifically, women have faulted the mesh for bleeding, pelvic area pain, infection, and painful intercourse. Furthermore, the FDA has cited mesh erosion and mesh contraction as the two transvaginal mesh injuries reported with the most frequency.

The St. Louis class action attorneys at Carey Danis & Lowe are currently accepting transvaginal mesh cases, and are providing free legal evaluations. In addition, individuals who have questions about transvaginal mesh and health complications can pose those questions to our on-staff medical experts. Our team is here to support you with expert legal and medical advice.

 

Share you transvaginal mesh story with Carey Danis & Lowe by calling 800.721.2519, or by completing a confidential personal injury claim form.

Ethicon Mesh Lawsuit Update: Federal Judge Lays Out Plan for Bellwether Trials

By | Defective Medical Device litigation, Transvaginal Mesh, Uncategorized

ethicon johson johnsonA federal judge has outlined the process for selecting the first cases to go to trial in the Ethicon multidistrict litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. According to court documents, U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin has created a schedule for selecting plaintiffs’ cases involving the Ethicon Gynecare Prolift vaginal mesh product.

As detailed in the court’s schedule, discovery pool cases are to be submitted by September 6, 2013, with five cases selected per side. Trial pool cases are to be submitted on January 6, 2014, with three cases per side.

After the trial pool cases are submitted by both the plaintiffs and the defendants, Judge Goodwin will select two bellwether trial cases. The first bellwether trial in the Ethicon MDL is currently scheduled for August 19, 2014.

With the announcement of a schedule outlining pretrial proceedings and the first bellwether trial, there appears to be much progress being made in the Ethicon MDL. The court next convenes on Thursday, September 19, 2013 for a status conference.

As of August 28, 2013, there are 9,419 transvaginal mesh lawsuits that have been consolidated into the Ethicon MDL in West Virginia. This number has climbed by nearly 1,000 cases in the past month, which is evidence that more and more women are stepping forward to file cases against Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon for injuries they believe they sustained through the use of these manufacturers’ vaginal mesh products.

If you believe that your injuries were caused by an implant of transvaginal mesh, contact Carey Danis & Lowe to get medical advice from one of our medical experts, as well as to receive a free legal evaluation about your vaginal mesh case from one of our experienced transvaginal mesh lawyers.

Contact Carey Danis & Lowe by calling 800.721.2519 or by submitting a personal injury claim form.

Stay current on the latest Ethicon mesh lawsuit news by following the Carey Danis & Lowe blog.

Judge Selects Four Bellwether Cases in Ethicon Transvaginal Mesh Litigation in West Virginia

By | Defective Medical Device litigation, Transvaginal Mesh, Uncategorized

ethicon johson johnsonU.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin has selected four bellwether cases in the Ethicon multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia.

The four bellwether cases are:

  • Carolyn Lewis, et al. v. Johnson & Johnson, et al. 2:12-cv-04301 TVT
  • Judy Brown, et al. v. Ethicon, Inc., et al. 2:12-cv-07314 TVT
  • Jo Huskey, et al. v. Ethicon, Inc., et al. 2:12-cv-05201 TVT-O
  • Tonya Edwards, et al. v. Ethicon, Inc., et al. 2:12-cv-09972 TVT-O

The first bellwether case, Lewis v. Johnson & Johnson, will be tried on January 14, 2014, with the second bellwether case, Brown v. Ethicon, scheduled for May 27, 2014. As detailed in court documents, Judge Goodwin will hear a case involving Ethicon’s Gynecare Prolift transvaginal mesh product in the third bellwether trial.

With the selection of these bellwether cases, Judge Goodwin has set forth a pretrial management schedule. By September 16, 2013, the plaintiffs have been ordered to submit a list of expert witnesses and deposition dates. Following this, the defendants will deliver a list of their experts and deposition dates by September 27, 2013.

Carey Danis & Lowe transvaginal mesh lawyers is a national law firm that represents individuals who claim to have been injured by Johnson & Johnson’s transvaginal mesh devices, such as the Ethicon Gynecare Prolift. Carey Danis & Lowe is pleased to see the Ethicon MDL moving forward with the selection and scheduling of bellwether cases.

Women have filed transvaginal mesh lawsuits citing intense pelvic region pain, bleeding, infection, organ damage, mesh erosion, mesh contraction, and painful intercourse. Carey Danis & Lowe encourages anyone who has experienced an injury that they believe is linked to an implant of a transvaginal mesh device to contact one of our experienced transvaginal mesh lawyers today.

Contact Carey Danis & Lowe by calling 800.721.2519, or by submitting a personal injury claim form.

Federal Judge Rules in Plaintiffs’ Favor in Ethicon Mesh MDL in West Virginia

By | Defective Medical Device litigation, Transvaginal Mesh, Uncategorized

ethicon_johson_johnson_gynecare_prolift_lawsuit_revsional_surgeryThe parties involved in the Ethicon multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia are facing difficulty regarding discovery requests, according to a recently filed pretrial order. In July 2012, the plaintiffs supplied the defendants with an initial request for more information, also called interrogatories.

Upon receiving the defendants’ responses, the plaintiffs requested additional information, which was given to them in the spring of 2013. However, the plaintiffs found these responses to be lacking, and thus, the issue was brought before U.S. Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for resolution.

Judge Eifert ruled that the defendants’ responses to the plaintiffs’ requests for information to be incomplete, and ordered Ethicon to serve the plaintiffs with yet another set of responses that are more specific.

Carey Danis & Lowe transvaginal mesh lawyers consider Judge Eifert’s ruling to be a fair and in line with an efficient legal process. Carey Danis & Lowe is pleased to see the Ethicon MDL moving forward despite setbacks with discovery, though this recent ruling should allow for more ground to be covered in the coming months.

Carey Danis & Lowe is a national law firm representing individuals who claim to have been injured by a transvaginal mesh product, such as the Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Gynecare Prolift. Women and their families have filed transvaginal mesh lawsuits alleging that transvaginal mesh products caused injuries from mesh erosion and mesh contraction, including bleeding, infection, organ damage, and pelvic area pain. In some cases, women have undergone several surgical operations to remove the hardened mesh with little success or relief.

If you or someone you love has been injured by a transvaginal mesh product like the Ethicon Gynecare Prolift, contact a transvaginal mesh lawyer for a free legal evaluation and for assistance with filing a transvaginal mesh lawsuit. Contact Carey Danis & Lowe by calling 800.721.2519 or by submitting a personal injury claim form.

Ethicon Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit News: Judge Rules in Favor of Efficient Deposition Process

By | Defective Medical Device litigation, Transvaginal Mesh, Uncategorized

ethicon johson johnsonIn the Ethicon transvaginal mesh multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia deposition scheduling process is the topic of one of the most recent pretrial orders filed this month in the case. According to the defendants, Ethicon, Inc., a Johnson & Johnson subsidiary responsible for the development of the Gynecare Prolift transvaginal mesh product, the deposition process must be more efficient.

The defendants argued in pretrial order 55 that the plaintiffs are ordering the deposition of some individuals twice. As such, the defendants claimed that the lengthy deposition process will significantly impact their their business proceedings.

They requested that individuals who have were asked to provide testimony as both a corporate representative and as a fact witness be scheduled in back-to-back meetings, as the current schedule calls for some of these individuals for provide depositions days or weeks apart. As a result, Ethicon asked for a protective order.

As detailed in the pretrial order, the plaintiffs pointed to a deposition process agreement, which states that back-to-back scheduling of witnesses is not necessary. Furthermore, the plaintiffs made an argument against back-to-back scheduling of corporate executives who are also being deposed as fact witnesses due to the importance of evaluating their testimony from one deposition before moving on to the next. Also, plaintiffs made a case against back-to-back depositions, as they saw this as influencing the possibility of the court combining two different depositions from the same individual into a singular testimony.

Ultimately, U.S. Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert ruled against the defendants’ protective order request on the grounds that the defendants did not adequately demonstrate the need for such an order.

The plaintiffs in the Ethicon MDL have filed their transvaginal mesh injury claims citing that Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon’s transvaginal mesh products caused serious injury, and that the medical device manufacturer failed to warn patients and health care providers about the health risks associated with the use of their surgical mesh products. There are currently 8,553 transvaginal mesh lawsuits in the Ethicon MDL in West Virginia.

Women who have received an implant of transvaginal mesh to treat either pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or stress urinary incontinence (SUI) cite the following as transvaginal mesh injuries: mesh erosion, mesh contraction, organ damage, infection, bleeding, severe pelvic area pain, and painful intercourse. In order to remove the defective transvaginal mesh, individuals have often undergone numerous surgical operations, sometimes with little success.

Carey Danis & Lowe transvaginal mesh lawyers are pleased to see the court rule in favor of collecting depositions in an efficient manner. As a transvaginal mesh law firm representing individuals who claim to have been injured by transvaginal mesh products, Carey Danis & Lowe strongly believes in an efficient legal process that supplies plaintiffs with their day in court.

If you or someone you love has been injured by Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon’s Gynecare Prolift, or another transvaginal mesh product, contact a transvaginal mesh lawyer at Carey Danis & Lowe. Call 800.721.2519 or submit a personal injury claim form.

Carey Danis & Lowe Transvaginal Mesh Lawyers Comment on Ethicon Multidistrict Litigation Bellwether Schedule

By | Defective Medical Device litigation, Transvaginal Mesh, Uncategorized

Published June 27, 2013 on PR Web

carey_danis_lowe_law_firm_pharmaceutical_litigation_medical_device_transvaginal_mesh_lawsuitSt. Louis, Missouri (PRWEB) June 27, 2013

Carey Danis & Lowe transvaginal mesh lawyers are currently following the Ethicon multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. As a national law firm representing individuals who claim to have been injured through the use of vaginal mesh products, such as the Ethicon Gynecare Prolift, Carey Danis & Lowe has noticed significant developments unfolding in the Ethicon MDL, whose progress is detailed in a court document, pretrial order number 52.*

According to this court document, bellwether presentations have been rescheduled from July 18, 2013 to July 25, 2013. Carey Danis & Lowe transvaginal mesh lawyers deem the bellwether process an efficient way to handle thousands of similar cases. During the bellwether presentations, the plaintiffs’ legal counsel will present cases to presiding U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. Cases selected for bellwether presentations are usually representative of the whole, which in this case, includes the more than 7,000 cases in the Ethicon MDL and the thousands of cases consolidated into the four other vaginal mesh MDLs being heard in West Virginia, according to Carey Danis & Lowe transvaginal mesh lawyers.

As legal counsel to plaintiffs who allege injury from vaginal mesh products, Carey Danis & Lowe is interested in closely monitoring the bellwether presentations and case selection process, as it may impact cases being investigated and litigated by vaginal mesh lawyers at Carey Danis & Lowe.

There are currently 7,341 cases in the Ethicon MDL, and in the month of May 2013 alone, another 1,024 vaginal mesh lawsuits were consolidated into the MDL in West Virginia. The Ethicon MDL is In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation MDL No. 2327.

Carey Danis & Lowe has sought to address the rise in vaginal mesh lawsuits through educational means and acting as legal counsel to injured parties. The team of transvaginal mesh lawyers at Carey Danis & Lowe has made available a Transvaginal Mesh Information page on the Carey Danis & Lowe website. The purpose of the Transvaginal Mesh Information page is to be an invaluable resource to individuals who want to understand more about vaginal mesh products, their use, and to explore their legal options.

Carey Danis & Lowe transvaginal mesh lawyers receive inquiries on a frequent basis from women who allege that their injuries are associated with transvaginal mesh implants. Carey Danis & Lowe continues to investigate transvaginal mesh cases, and as such, is providing injured parties with free legal consultations. Furthermore, transvaginal mesh lawyers at Carey Danis & Lowe are also assisting in filing vaginal mesh lawsuits.

For more information about legal options, a free legal evaluation, and assistance in filing a vaginal mesh lawsuit, contact Carey Danis & Lowe by calling 800.721.2519.

——

About Carey Danis & Lowe

Carey Danis & Lowe is a plaintiff’s litigation firm based in St. Louis, Missouri with law offices across the United States in Illinois, Missouri, and Florida. Carey Danis & Lowe specializes in defective drug and pharmaceutical litigation and class action lawsuits. The Carey Danis & Lowe team is comprised of experienced attorneys working alongside knowledgeable professional staff that includes medical doctors, nurses, and information technology specialists. Contact Carey Danis & Lowe at 800-721-2519.

Sources